|
WASHINGTON (June 22, 2009) — In a blow to trophy hunting groups like Safari Club International, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia today struck down a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rule allowing sport-hunting of endangered antelopes at “canned” hunting facilities. Safari Club and other trophy hunting advocates intervened in the case, and argued in favor of legalizing the shooting of endangered animals trapped in enclosures. The court rejected the Safari Club’s arguments, and declared the rule to be contrary to the requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act. “The Safari Club’s outrageous position in favor of the drive-thru killing of endangered species shows just how far from mainstream American values this group really is,” said Jonathan R. Lovvorn, vice president and chief counsel for animal protection litigation at The Humane Society of the United States. “Canned hunting is not sport, and certainly not conservation, and we are delighted that the court has rejected this inhumane and unsportsmanlike practice.” The suit was filed by The Humane Society of the United States, Defenders of Wildlife, Born Free USA, Kimya Institute and several individuals, to challenge a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service decision allowing three critically endangered African antelope species – the scimitar-horned oryx, addax and dama gazelle – to be hunted for trophies at fenced “game” ranches in Texas, Florida and other states. The agency also allows endangered antelope “trophies” to be sold in the United States and abroad. The plaintiffs challenged the agency’s decision, which was based on the Orwellian proposition that the conservation of endangered species is dependent on killing them. “It is unconscionable that the trophy hunting industry would undermine global conservation efforts for sport and profit,” noted Adam M. Roberts, senior vice president of Born Free USA. “We hope the Obama administration takes notice of today’s ruling and ensures that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service no longer allows canned trophy hunts of endangered species.” Katherine Meyer, lead attorney for the groups, said that the decision is an “important vindication of the public’s right to monitor how endangered species are being treated under the Act, who is given permission to harm them, and why.” Facts: The plaintiffs are represented in the case by the public-interest law firms Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C. Media Contacts: Liz Bergstrom/HSUS: 301-258-1455, ebergstrom@humanesociety.org Adam M. Roberts/Born Free USA: 202-445-3572, adam@bornfreeusa.org